WebChaffin v. Brame is the most recent of a number of cases that involve an after-dark collision of an automobile with a parked vehicle or some other stationary object.3 The rule of "outrunning headlights" appli-1233 N. C. 377, 64 S. E. 2d 276 (1951). Thomas v. Thurston Motor Lines, 230 N. C. 122, 52 S. E. 2d 377 (1949). WebCitationChaffin v. Brame, 233 N.C. 377 (N.C. 1951) Brief Fact Summary. Brame (Defendant) parked his vehicle on a highway at night without warning lights or signals. …

64 S.E.2d 276 (N.C. 1951), 308, Chaffin v. Brame - North Carolina ...

WebPage 276. 64 S.E.2d 276 233 N.C. 377 CHAFFIN, v. BRAME. No. 308 Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 28, 1951. M. T. Leatherman, C. E. Leatherman, Lincolnton, and J ... WebCHAFFIN, v. BRAME. No. 308 Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 28, 1951. M. T. Leatherman, C. E. Leatherman, Lincolnton, and J. Francis Paschal, Raleigh, for plaintiff, … philips barista coffee maker

Chaffin v. Brame, No. 308 - North Carolina - Case Law - VLEX …

WebChaffin v. Brame 233 N.C. 377, 64 S.E.2d 276 (1951) Facts: Plaintiff was driving on a highway when defendant approached from the opposite direction. Defendant refused to dim his lights, temporarily blinding plaintiff; plaintiff then ran into an unlit truck that had been blocking the whole right lane. WebSep 17, 2008 · Chaffin v. Brame; Marshall v. Southern Railway Co. Torts; Contacts; Torts; Brown Machine, Inc. v. Hercules, Inc. Princess Cruises, Inc. v. General Electric Co. … WebIn Chaffin v. Brame, 233 N.C. 377, 64 S.E.2d 276, where the plaintiff collided with the rear of an unlighted truck parked on the highway at night, the court stated: "The duty of the … trust tax rate table